**下列內容祗供參考可能會有所修改**
held on 12 September 2001 at OFTA's
Conference Room
Present: |
Mr. T.Y.
Chan |
OFTA (Chairman) |
|
Mr.
Paul Anderson |
HARTS |
|
Mr. Ho
Wing-leung |
HKARA |
|
Mr.
Hung Siu-hung |
HKARA |
|
Mr.
Chiu Wai Ho |
CARSC |
|
Mr.
Tang Wai Peng |
CARSC |
|
Mr.
Warren Wong |
OFTA |
|
Mr. C.K.
Cheng |
OFTA |
|
Mr. Y.C.
Leung |
OFTA |
|
Mr.
Warren Kwok |
OFTA |
|
Mr. K.T.
Seto |
OFTA |
|
Mr. H.C.
Chan |
OFTA |
|
Mr. C.S.
Wong |
OFTA (Secretary) |
1. |
Confirmation of Notes of Last
Meeting
|
1.1 |
The
notes of the meeting on 28 February 2001 were confirmed
without amendment. |
2. |
Matters
arising in the last meeting |
2.1 |
The
Chairman stated that HKARA and/or other societies may
provide further proposal for the operation of the
proposed Hong Kong Ham Net. |
2.2 |
The
Chairman confirmed that OFTA have set up formal contact
with 5 administrations (i.e. United States, Canada,
Australia, Japan, and Macau) for the reciprocal licensing
arrangement and was still awaiting reply. For mainland China, the issue has
been brought up in the last frequency coordinating
meeting with Ministry of Information Industry (MII) in
May. It was found that the licensing issuing authority in
China (i.e. China Radio Sports Association) had issued
Guidelines for overseas (including Hong Kong) amateurs to
apply for amateur operation in the mainland, reciprocal
recognition agreement may not be necessary.. The
Chairman welcomed the societies to report to this office
if there were problems regarding the current arrangement
in China. |
3. |
OFTA’s
DF System
|
3.1 |
The
Chairman said that the RMU DF's system has been put into
operation and the performance was satisfactory. It
was hoped that the system would improve the overall
efficiency of RMU and hence complaints from amateurs
could be dealt with faster. |
4. |
Repeater
Linking
|
4.1 |
The
Chairman told the members that the proposal to install
linking facility for the amateur repeater at Tate's Carin
was not acceptable. The Chairman also
reminded that all the existing amateur repeaters were not
only used by HARTS’s members but also for use by all
licensed amateurs. Mr. Anderson agreed to submit a
revised version to OFTA for further consideration.
|
5. |
Call
Sign Arrangement |
5.1 |
Mr.
Seto introduced the paper on the arrangement of Amateur
Station Call Sign Assignment (Annex 1). The
chairman said that the new arrangement would be
implemented in due course. |
5.2 |
The
Chairman supplemented that in order to make the
assignment of Call Sign more open, a list of the
available Call Signs for potential Amateur users would be
published on OFTA’s homepage for public browsing. The
list would be updated monthly and all released Call Signs
(i.e. Call Signs withdrawn from former users) would be
highlighted in the list and frozen for 2 years before re-assigned
to new users. |
6. |
Amateur
Band Harmonization |
6.1 |
Mr.
Cheng confirmed that as the issue for the IARU submission
to WRC2003 was one of the study items in the study group
of WRC 2003. It was not appropriate to have discussion in
this meeting. However, Hong Kong would have a position
paper to consult the public (i.e. through the RSAC). The Chairman also said that as
Amateur societies had no representatives in the RSAC,
OFTA would keep the societies informed on the progress of
the consultation. |
6.2 |
Mr.
Cheng confirmed that the assignment of frequency for
other services would subject to the existing usage of
frequency in Hong Kong and the nearby provinces and OFTA
had to protect the primary services. As the 430-440 MHz
band was allocated to radiolocation service for primary
operation in Region 3, OFTA would have no objection for
the licensed amateur user to listen/receive on the
frequency 439-439.975MHz (the frequencies operated by the
amateur radio repeaters in nearby provinces of mainland
China) in principle. However, transmission on this
frequency band for amateur users should be strictly
prohibited. |
6.3 |
Mr.
Cheng confirmed that there were no spare channels
available for further assignment within the frequency
band of 1240-1300MHz. This band had been fully occupied
by the users of primary service (i.e. Radiolocation
Service) and OFTA was unable to release any frequency
channels for Amateur service. |
7. |
Amateur
Radio Activities as Service to the Community |
7.1 |
The
Chairman requested Mr. Paul Anderson of HARTS to have
further clarification on this issue. Mr.
Anderson confirmed that they requested OFTA to provide
additional assistance (i.e. shorten the application/approval
time) in their applications for establishing temporary
radio stations/repeaters for the provision of radio
service to functions and activities of the community. The
Chairman confirmed that OFTA was always willing to
provide all possible convenience and assistance to any
applications which serve the community. However, OFTA
could not commit on a specific shortest period required
for different kinds of applications as
the natures of different applications were different. The
Chairman requested the societies to provide sufficient
supporting documents and allow at least 2 weeks for
OFTA to process an application. Longer time may be
required for complicated application. |
8. |
Feasibility
of Licensing CB for Land Use
|
8.1 |
The
Chairman stated that that OFTA previously had
considered on the feasibility of legalizing the use of CB
channels (i.e. from 26.965 – 27.405MHz) in Hong Kong by
introducing the Class Licence. However, during the
equipment survey, it was found that the operating
frequency range of most of the CB radio equipment
available in the market covered the Amateur
Band (i.e. 28.0 – 29.7MHz). OFTA considered
liberalizing the CB radio might cause harmful and
uncontrollable interference to the existing Amateur users.
Mr.
Anderson of HARTS asked whether this problem could be
tackled by tightening the local type-approved equipment
standard in order to prohibit the CB radio equipment to
have transmission at the amateur band. The
Chairman said that this was not feasible due to limited
market in Hong Kong. If we tightened our standard, there
would be no equipment available in the market for the CB
users in Hong Kong. Hence it would cause the
liberalization meaningless. Mr.
Anderson said that HARTS would try to gather additional
information about the suitable CB radio equipment to meet
the special need in Hong Kong for OFTA's consideration. |
9. |
Family
Radio Service Band for Public Use
|
9.1 |
Mr.
Cheng confirmed that the 14 FRS Channels which currently
used in USA were all allocated for Land Mobile services
in Hong Kong and hence it was not possible to adopt this
system in Hong Kong. |
9.2 |
Mr.
Hung Siu Hung of HKARA then asked OFTA to study the
possibility for adopting the similar systems that were
currently used in Europe. Mr.
Cheng agreed to have further study on the feasibility on
the European Systems and requested Mr. Hung to provide
additional information. |
9.3 |
The
Chairman also said that to liberalize the use of CB radio
might be a way out in the future and OFTA would also
considered the possibility of allocating more open
channels for general public use for leisure purpose. |
10 |
Power
Limit of Fixed Station Operation for 144MHz band |
10.1 |
Mr.
Cheng asked the societies to provide reasons for the need
to increase the power for 144MHz band. Mr.
Ho of HKARA explained that they just wanted to keep it in
line with other frequency bands within the schedule of
the licence. Mr.
Cheng explained that as the VHF allocated for MRS service
were all limited at 25 watts, in order to minimize the
potential interference problem, OFTA considered that the
power limit for amateur band at 144MHz should be in line
with the existing huge group of MRS users. |
10.2 |
The Chairman also confirmed that
OFTA had planned to limit the power output for the 430MHz
band down to 25 watts as well in the next round.
Societies would be kept informed.
|
11. |
Waiving of Amateur Licence Fee
for Senior Citizen
|
11.1 |
The
Chairman apologized that in accordance with the current
legislation, OFTA had no authority to waive any licence
fee. |
12. |
Amateur Licensing Procedural
Matters
|
12.1 |
Mr.
Anderson enquired OFTA regarding the procedures for the
licensees to change address and also to review it to make
it more efficient (i.e. to simplify the documentary
evidence requirement for the ownership/occupation of the
premises). Mr.
H.C.Chan confirmed that currently OFTA also accepted the
invoices/bills issued by the public services (i.e. gas
bills, electricity bills, water bills) as documentry
evidence. OFTA considered this should be acceptable
method for both the applicants and the authority. |
12.2 |
The
Chairman further stated that to permit the installation
of amateur radiocommunication in commercial
vehicles was not acceptable since the amateur
radiocommunication was solely for leisure purpose. |
12.3 |
As the
Amateur Licensing Procedural Matters were considered as
an on-going issue, the Chairman requested to keep this
item in the Agenda for future meetings. |
13 |
Any
Other Business |
13.1 |
Revision
of Frequency Allocation Mr.
Cheng reported that, in accordance with the WRC2000, some
frequency band previously allocated to Amateur would be
revised (i.e. from 75.5 – 78GHz and 142 – 149GHz).
The information were given in Annex 2. The
Chairman requested the societies to pass this information
to their members. OFTA might inform all the licensees by
a circular letter. |
13.2 |
Mr. Ho
of HKARA said that the above frequency bands were too
high beyond the need for the existing amateur users. Mr.
Ho hoped that OFTA could consider to allocating more
frequencies under 3GHz band for amateur use. The
Chairman replied that according to the existing congested
band plan, it was difficult for OFTA to have additional
assignment below 3GHz. OFTA needed to balance the demand
of different service sectors and all frequency assignment
matters will have sufficient consultation and discussion
through the Radio Spectrum Advisory Committee (RSAC). |
13.3 |
Mr. Ho
further enquired about whether OFTA would allow the use
of new transmission technology for the amateur service (i.e.
spread spectrum). The
Chairman requested the societies to provide more
information on the new technology which they would like
to employ in the amateur stations and detail technical
specifications of equipment for OFTA’s
consideration |
13.4 |
Mr.
Anderson of HARTS stated that the Internet Licensing
Service was welcomed by amateurs and OFTA should make it
permanent. The Chairman replied that OFTA would later
make the service permanently. |
14. |
Date of
Next Meeting |
14.1 |
OFTA
would inform all members the exact date of the next
meeting. |
|
|