"For members only"
held on
12 September 2001 at OFTA's Conference Room
Present: |
Mr. T.Y. Chan |
OFTA (Chairman) |
|
Mr. Paul Anderson |
HARTS |
|
Mr. Ho Wing-leung |
HKARA |
|
Mr. Hung Siu-hung |
HKARA |
|
Mr. Chiu Wai Ho |
CARSC |
|
Mr. Tang Wai Peng |
CARSC |
|
Mr. Warren Wong |
OFTA |
|
Mr. C.K. Cheng |
OFTA |
|
Mr. Y.C. Leung |
OFTA |
|
Mr. Warren Kwok |
OFTA |
|
Mr. K.T. Seto |
OFTA |
|
Mr. H.C. Chan |
OFTA |
|
Mr. C.S. Wong |
OFTA (Secretary) |
1. |
Confirmation
of Notes of Last Meeting
|
1.1 |
The notes of the meeting on 28 February 2001
were confirmed without amendment. |
2. |
Matters arising in the last meeting |
2.1 |
The Chairman stated that HKARA and/or other
societies may provide further proposal for the operation
of the proposed Hong Kong Ham Net. |
2.2 |
The Chairman confirmed that OFTA have set up
formal contact with 5 administrations (i.e. United
States, Canada, Australia, Japan, and Macau) for the
reciprocal licensing arrangement and was still awaiting
reply. For mainland
China, the issue has been brought up in the last
frequency coordinating meeting with Ministry of
Information Industry (MII) in May. It was found that the
licensing issuing authority in China (i.e. China Radio
Sports Association) had issued Guidelines for overseas (including
Hong Kong) amateurs to apply for amateur operation in the
mainland, reciprocal recognition agreement
may not be necessary.. The Chairman welcomed the
societies to report to this office if there were problems
regarding the current arrangement in China. |
3. |
OFTA¡¦s DF System
|
3.1 |
The Chairman said that the RMU DF's system
has been put into operation and the performance was
satisfactory. It was hoped that the system
would improve the overall efficiency of RMU and hence
complaints from amateurs could be dealt with faster. |
4. |
Repeater Linking
|
4.1 |
The Chairman told the members that the
proposal to install linking facility for the amateur
repeater at Tate's Carin was not acceptable.
|
5. |
Call Sign Arrangement |
5.1 |
Mr. Seto introduced the paper on the
arrangement of Amateur Station Call Sign Assignment (Annex
1). The chairman said that the new
arrangement would be implemented in due course. |
5.2 |
The Chairman supplemented that in order to
make the assignment of Call Sign more open, a list of the
available Call Signs for potential Amateur users would be
published on OFTA¡¦s homepage
for public browsing. The list would be updated monthly
and all released Call Signs (i.e. Call Signs withdrawn
from former users) would be highlighted in the list and
frozen for 2 years before re-assigned to new users. |
6. |
Amateur Band Harmonization |
6.1 |
Mr. Cheng confirmed that as the issue for
the IARU submission to WRC2003 was one of the study items
in the study group of WRC 2003. It was not appropriate to
have discussion in this meeting. However, Hong Kong would
have a position paper to consult the public (i.e. through
the RSAC). The Chairman
also said that as Amateur societies had no
representatives in the RSAC, OFTA would keep the
societies informed on the progress of the consultation. |
6.2 |
Mr. Cheng confirmed that the assignment of
frequency for other services would subject to the
existing usage of frequency in Hong Kong and the nearby
provinces and OFTA had to protect the primary services.
As the 430-440 MHz band was allocated to radiolocation
service for primary operation in Region 3, OFTA would
have no objection for the licensed amateur user to listen/receive
on the frequency 439-439.975MHz (the frequencies operated
by the amateur radio repeaters in nearby provinces of
mainland China) in principle. However, transmission on
this frequency band for amateur users should be strictly
prohibited. |
6.3 |
Mr. Cheng confirmed that there were no spare
channels available for further assignment within the
frequency band of 1240-1300MHz. This band had been fully
occupied by the users of primary service (i.e.
Radiolocation Service) and OFTA was unable to release any
frequency channels for Amateur service. |
7. |
Amateur Radio Activities as Service to
the Community |
7.1 |
The Chairman requested Mr. Paul Anderson of
HARTS to have further clarification on this issue. Mr. Anderson confirmed that they requested
OFTA to provide additional assistance (i.e. shorten the
application/approval time) in their applications for
establishing temporary radio stations/repeaters for the
provision of radio service to functions and activities of
the community. The Chairman confirmed that OFTA was always
willing to provide all possible convenience and
assistance to any applications which serve the community.
However, OFTA could not commit on a specific
shortest period required for different kinds of applications
as the natures of different applications were
different. The Chairman requested the societies to
provide sufficient supporting documents and allow at
least 2 weeks for OFTA to process an application.
Longer time may be required for complicated application. |
8. |
Feasibility of Licensing CB for Land Use
|
8.1 |
The Chairman stated that that OFTA
previously had considered on the feasibility of
legalizing the use of CB channels (i.e. from 26.965 ¡V
27.405MHz) in Hong Kong by introducing
the Class Licence. However, during the equipment survey,
it was found that the operating frequency range of most
of the CB radio equipment available in the market
covered the Amateur Band (i.e. 28.0 ¡V 29.7MHz). OFTA considered liberalizing
the CB radio might cause harmful and uncontrollable
interference to the existing Amateur users. Mr. Anderson of HARTS asked whether this
problem could be tackled by tightening the local type-approved
equipment standard in order to prohibit the CB radio
equipment to have transmission at the amateur band. The Chairman said that this was not feasible
due to limited market in Hong Kong. If we tightened our
standard, there would be no equipment available in the
market for the CB users in Hong Kong. Hence it would
cause the liberalization meaningless. Mr. Anderson said that HARTS would try to
gather additional information about the suitable CB radio
equipment to meet the special need in Hong Kong for
OFTA's consideration. |
9. |
Family Radio Service Band for Public Use
|
9.1 |
Mr. Cheng confirmed that the 14 FRS Channels
which currently used in USA were all allocated for Land
Mobile services in Hong Kong and hence it was not
possible to adopt this system in Hong Kong. |
9.2 |
Mr. Hung Siu Hung of HKARA then asked OFTA
to study the possibility for adopting the similar systems
that were currently used in Europe. Mr. Cheng agreed to have further study on
the feasibility on the European Systems and requested Mr.
Hung to provide additional information. |
9.3 |
The Chairman also said that to liberalize
the use of CB radio might be a way out in the future and
OFTA would also considered the possibility of allocating
more open channels for general public use for leisure
purpose. |
10 |
Power Limit of Fixed Station Operation
for 144MHz band |
10.1 |
Mr. Cheng asked the societies to provide
reasons for the need to increase the power for 144MHz
band. Mr. Ho of HKARA explained that they just
wanted to keep it in line with other frequency bands
within the schedule of the licence. Mr. Cheng explained that as the VHF
allocated for MRS service were all limited at 25 watts,
in order to minimize the potential interference problem,
OFTA considered that the power limit for amateur band at
144MHz should be in line with the existing huge group of
MRS users. |
10.2 |
The Chairman
also confirmed that OFTA had planned to limit the power
output for the 430MHz band down to 25 watts as well in
the next round. Societies would be kept informed.
|
11. |
Waiving of
Amateur Licence Fee for Senior Citizen
|
11.1 |
The Chairman apologized that in accordance
with the current legislation, OFTA had no authority to
waive any licence fee. |
12. |
Amateur
Licensing Procedural Matters
|
12.1 |
Mr. Anderson enquired OFTA regarding the
procedures for the licensees to change address and also
to review it to make it more efficient (i.e. to simplify
the documentary evidence requirement for the ownership/occupation
of the premises). Mr. H.C.Chan confirmed that currently OFTA
also accepted the invoices/bills issued by the public
services (i.e. gas bills, electricity bills, water bills)
as documentry evidence. OFTA considered this should be
acceptable method for both the applicants and the
authority. |
12.2 |
The Chairman further stated that to permit
the installation of amateur radiocommunication in commercial
vehicles was not acceptable since the amateur
radiocommunication was solely for leisure purpose. |
12.3 |
As the Amateur Licensing Procedural Matters
were considered as an on-going issue, the Chairman
requested to keep this item in the Agenda for future
meetings. |
13 |
Any Other Business |
13.1 |
Revision of Frequency Allocation Mr. Cheng reported that, in accordance with
the WRC2000, some frequency band previously allocated to
Amateur would be revised (i.e. from 75.5 ¡V 78GHz and 142 ¡V 149GHz).
The information were given in Annex 2. The Chairman requested the societies to pass
this information to their members. OFTA might inform all
the licensees by a circular letter. |
13.2 |
Mr. Ho of HKARA said that the above
frequency bands were too high beyond the need for the
existing amateur users. Mr. Ho hoped that OFTA could
consider to allocating more frequencies under 3GHz band
for amateur use. The Chairman replied that according to the
existing congested band plan, it was difficult for OFTA
to have additional assignment below 3GHz. OFTA needed to
balance the demand of different service sectors and all
frequency assignment matters will have sufficient
consultation and discussion through the Radio Spectrum
Advisory Committee (RSAC). |
13.3 |
Mr. Ho further enquired about whether OFTA
would allow the use of new transmission technology for
the amateur service (i.e. spread spectrum). The Chairman requested the societies to
provide more information on the new technology which they
would like to employ in the amateur stations and detail
technical specifications of equipment for OFTA¡¦s consideration |
13.4 |
Mr. Anderson of HARTS stated that the
Internet Licensing Service was welcomed by amateurs and
OFTA should make it permanent. The Chairman replied that
OFTA would later make the service permanently. |
14. |
Date of Next Meeting |
14.1 |
OFTA would
inform all members the exact date of the next meeting. |
|
|